Search for: "Ralph Lauren Media, LLC" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 3:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Westchester Media, 214 F.3d at 672 (holding that publisher of Polo magazine was liable for infringement of Ralph Lauren’s Polo mark, but also holding that the district court erred in enjoining the publisher to cease publishing the magazine with that title). [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:12 pm
Some current IAVA members include Disney, Coach, Condé Nast, The Ellen Degeneres Show, Estée Lauder, HBO, Keller Crescent, Monster.com, MTV, Polo Ralph Lauren, Sotheby’s Institute of Art, Tribal DDB, Victoria’s Secret, Wired, Yahoo! [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
Chase LLC -  http://bit.ly/SSv96a (Todd Ohlms, Joseph Fogel) Failing to Preserve:  Apple, Samsung Narrowly Escape Adverse Inference Instruction - http://bit.ly/RuTGtt (Michael Kozubek) Five Questions with Ralph Losey about the New eDiscovery Best Practices (EDBP) Model for Attorneys – http://bit.ly/SXuNJ4 (Dean Gonsowski) Five Reasons to Outsource Litigation Support - http://bit.ly/StFgvy (Ralph Losey) How to Preserve Data When… [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 2:10 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
They regularly handle leasing for the top landlords in New York City such as Tishman Speyer, Vornado Realty Trust, SL Green Realty Corp. and SJP Properties and have negotiated leases for the headquarters of Gap Inc., Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and the National Football League. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:11 am by Rob Robinson
Machine" http://t.co/pjQ6w6z (Howard Sklar) Open Letter Response to ALM’s Question About “Certification Debate” and eDiscovery Team Training - http://tinyurl.com/42orgdf(Ralph Losey) Predictive Coding: Bragging Rights or Blowing Smoke? [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Scripps Networks Interactive, LLC, 2011 WL 1750711 (W.D. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
Litigators) - bit.ly/ze3GCv (Bennett Borden, Monica McCarroll, Lauren Wheeling) A Look Back: Top 10 eDiscovery Developments and Trends Emerging Out of 2011 – http://bit.ly/zuSsjZ (Jay Yurkiw) An Ode to the Rarest of Creatures: the eDiscovery Lawyer – bit.ly/AlPVE1 (BLLAWG) Analyzing Novel Issues in Internet Jurisdiction - bit.ly/y6v2Bp (Richard Raysman, Peter Brown) Breaking Down the eDiscovery Model Order - bit.ly/yxpkXT (Barry Shelton)… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 12:54 pm by Bona Law PC
Ralph Lauren Corp., plaintiff was an authorized retailer of defendant’s branded home products. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:30 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/6e8vqra (Ben Kerschberg) Anti-Spam Law Governs Social Media Pages, Court Rules – http://tinyurl.com/3oce3r7 (Eric Sinrod) Cost-Shifting eDiscovery and Third-Parties – http://tinyurl.com/3uuvhcv (Josh Gilliland) Court Declines to Hold that Lack of Written Litigation Hold Allows Presumption that Relevant Evidence was Lost or Destroyed - http://tinyurl.com/3hazg7j (K&L Gates) Court Finds Ineffective Assistance of Counsel for Failing to Object to Admission of… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(IP Komodo) Spain Custom reports 2010 statistics (Class 46) Taiwan Taiwan IP update: First Country that protects hologram in its Trademark Law (IP Dragon) Tajikistan Tajikistan dances to the beat of the WPPT (1709 Blog) United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office launches UK Peer to Patent Pilot (Patently-O) (IPKat) (IP Osgoode) UK Government releases report: ‘Intellectual Asset Management for Universities’ (IP Osgoode) When appeal loses its appeal: CSC turn tables on VPL: CSC… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]